Intramural and Extramural Activities and Tournament

Grade 12 · Physical Education

Semester 1 | Period 1 | Week 5

Download the Lessonotes Mobile Liberia app for faster lesson access on Android and iPhone.

Subject: Physical Education

Semester: 1

Period: 1

Week: 5


School Name: __________________________

Teacher’s Name: ________________________

Subject: Physical Education

Grade Level: Grade 12
Week & Period: Week 5, Period I
Date: __________________________

Topic: Intramural and Extramural Activities and Tournament
Subtopic: Evaluation and Improvement of School Sports Events

 

Learning Objectives:

By the end of the lesson, learners should be able to:

  1. Explain the importance of evaluating sports events.
  2. Identify criteria used to assess the success of a tournament.
  3. Suggest ways to improve future intramural and extramural activities.
  4. Practice reflection and feedback skills as a team.

 

Previous Knowledge:

Learners have completed planning and organizing mock or real tournaments in previous lessons.

 

Instructional Materials:

  • Sample event evaluation forms
  • Feedback rubrics
  • Whiteboard and markers
  • Reflection worksheets
  • Projector for sample review videos

 

ABC Teaching Model

A - Anticipation (Warm-Up) – 5 minutes

Teacher prompts:

  • Ask: “What would you do differently if you planned your last sports day again?”
  • Ask: “Why is feedback important after an event?”

Activity:

  • Students jog on the spot and do jumping jacks.
  • After each move, a student says one part of a tournament that can be improved (e.g., time management, officiating).

 

B - Building Knowledge (Main Lesson) – 25 minutes

Key Concepts:

  • Evaluation is the process of reviewing the event to see what went well and what needs improvement.
  • It helps in accountability, planning future events, and learning from mistakes.

Criteria for Evaluating a Sports Event:

  1. Timeliness
  2. Team participation and discipline
  3. Safety and emergency preparedness
  4. Spectator engagement
  5. Fairness of officiating
  6. Communication and announcements
  7. Overall coordination

Examples:

  • Poor timekeeping disrupted final match schedule.
  • One team did not receive updated fixture due to communication failure.

Learners' Activities:

  • Use evaluation forms to rate a past or hypothetical school tournament.
  • Watch a short clip of a tournament and discuss pros and cons.
  • Create a two-column table: What went well? / What could be improved?
  • In groups, write a brief report recommending 3 improvements to a recent sports event.

 

C - Consolidation (Review and Assessment) – 10 minutes

Review Questions:

  1. Why is evaluating a sports event necessary?
  2. What are three aspects of a sports tournament that should be assessed?
  3. How can feedback improve future events?

Assessment:

  • Short quiz (multiple choice):
  1. Evaluation of a tournament helps to: A. Make more money
    Improve future events
    C. Avoid sports
    D. Stop playing
  2. Which of the following is part of event assessment? A. Buying jerseys
    Preparing snacks
    C. Judging coordination and timing
    D. Making flyers

Assignment:

  1. Interview a participant of a recent tournament and ask what they think could be improved.
  2. Fill a sample evaluation form for your school's last sports event.
  3. Write 100 words on how your team would organize better safety measures in future tournaments.

 

Detailed Notes:

  • Evaluation is critical in sports management.
  • Honest reflection helps build stronger event culture in schools.
  • Students develop responsibility, critical thinking, and leadership.

 

Expanded Instructions:

  • Encourage honest but respectful feedback.
  • Use real-life sports event clips for analysis.
  • Provide scaffolding for writing group reflections.

 

Inclusive/Differentiation:

  • Visual learners may draw charts.
  • Group discussions help verbal learners.
  • Low-literacy students may use symbols or verbal feedback.

Teacher’s Reflection:

  • Were learners able to analyze events critically?
  • Did they participate actively in evaluation tasks?
  • Were improvement suggestions practical?
  • How well did groups work together on reports