Download the Lessonotes Mobile Liberia app for faster lesson access on Android and iPhone.
Subject: Religious and Moral Education
Semester: 1
Period: 3
Week: 14
School Name:
Teacher’s Name:
Subject: Religious and Moral Education
Grade Level: Grade 6
Date: Week 14
Lesson Duration: 45 minutes
Week & Period: Week 14, Period 3
Topic: Styles of Conflict Management
Sub-topic: Meaning, styles, advantages and disadvantages, identifying personal style
Learning Objectives
By the end of the lesson, students should be able to:
- Define conflict management
- List and explain styles of conflict management (avoiding, accommodating, competing, compromising, collaborating)
- State advantages and disadvantages of each style
- Identify their own style of managing conflict
Previous Knowledge
Students already know what conflict means and basic ways to resolve it.
Instructional Materials
Flash cards, role-play scripts, pictures showing people solving conflicts differently, chalkboard.
Lesson Development – ABC Model
A – Anticipation (Warm-up / Starter)
Time: 5–10 minutes
Teacher asks: “When you fight with your brother or sister, what do you usually do? Walk away, argue, or forgive?” Students share answers, showing different styles.
B – Building Knowledge (Main Lesson Body)
Time: 25–30 minutes
The teacher begins by introducing the concept of conflict management. Conflict management means handling disagreements or arguments in ways that reduce tension, prevent harm, and bring about peace. Everyone experiences conflict in life—whether at home, in school, or in the community—but what matters most is how those conflicts are handled. To help learners understand that not all conflicts have to end in anger or fighting, the teacher presents five common styles of conflict management and explains when each might be useful.
The first style is avoiding. This means staying away from conflict and refusing to get involved. Sometimes this is useful, especially when the issue is small or when people need time to calm down. For example, if two friends are angry and one chooses to walk away instead of arguing, that helps prevent a fight. However, avoiding conflict for too long can be bad because the problem may not go away—it might even grow worse if it is ignored.
The second style is accommodating, which means giving in to what others want in order to keep peace. This can be good in situations where maintaining friendship or harmony is more important than being right. For instance, letting a friend pick the game you play even if it's not your favorite shows kindness and avoids argument. However, accommodating all the time may lead to one’s own needs being ignored or feeling unimportant.
The third style is competing. This is when someone insists on having their way, even if others disagree. It can be helpful in emergencies or when quick decisions are needed, such as when someone must take charge to stop danger. But it can also damage relationships if used too often, because it may seem selfish or disrespectful to others' opinions.
The fourth style is compromising, where both sides agree to give up something in order to reach a fair middle ground. An example would be two students who both want the same book agreeing to share it for equal time. This is often a peaceful solution, but it has a downside—neither person gets exactly what they wanted, so it might not fully satisfy anyone.
The fifth and most effective style is collaborating. This means working together to find a solution that satisfies everyone. It takes time and good communication, but it often leads to the best results. For example, in a group project, students with different ideas can combine them to create something even better. Collaboration helps build trust, respect, and long-term peace because everyone feels heard and valued.
To reinforce understanding, the teacher gives practical, relatable examples of each style: a child keeping quiet during an argument (avoiding), letting a sibling choose the TV show (accommodating), insisting on being the team leader (competing), taking turns with a favorite toy (compromising), and brainstorming ideas with classmates to solve a problem (collaborating). Learners are divided into groups and asked to role-play each conflict management style using examples from school or home. After each performance, the class reflects on the outcome and discusses whether peace was achieved and how people felt.
Learners’ Activities (Expanded): Students work in small groups to act out short scenes demonstrating each of the five conflict management styles. After each role-play, they reflect on which style they personally use the most and why. They then write in their notebooks one advantage and one disadvantage of the style they use most often, and consider whether they might want to try another style, such as collaboration, in the future.
Assessment Checks: The teacher asks oral questions to check understanding. “What is conflict management?” “Can you name one benefit of compromising?” “Which conflict style do you think works best for creating peace, and why?” The goal is to ensure learners can identify each style and understand its use.
Notes (Expanded & Detailed): Conflict is part of everyday life, and managing it well is important for personal development and community peace. Different conflict management styles are useful in different situations. Avoiding may be helpful to prevent immediate fights, while accommodating shows kindness. Competing may be needed during emergencies, and compromising helps find fairness. However, collaboration is often the best style because it allows everyone to participate in solving the problem. It builds trust, strengthens relationships, and helps people feel respected and understood. Learning how to manage conflict is a lifelong skill that helps individuals become better friends, family members, and citizens.
C – Consolidation (Conclusion & Assessment)
Time: 5–10 minutes
Summary: Conflict management means handling conflicts in ways that bring peace. Styles include avoiding, accommodating, competing, compromising, and collaborating, each with strengths and weaknesses.
Evaluation Method (Expanded): Exit slip/quiz: Students write their personal style of conflict management and why they use it. Teacher collects slips and gives oral feedback.
Assignment (Expanded): Interview a family member on how they solve conflicts. Write the style they use and explain if it is effective.
Follow-up Activity: Observe your own behavior in a conflict this week and write which style you used.
Differentiation / Inclusive Strategies
Teacher uses role-plays for active learners and written work for quiet learners. Encourages mixed groups for collaboration.
Teacher’s Reflection (After Class)
What worked well? ___________________________________________
What needs improvement? ____________________________________
Students’ engagement level: ☑ High ☑ Medium ☑ Low